Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa Slams Hired Journalists for Attacks on Judiciary
rachel jacob savage : ISLAMABAD – In a strong rebuke, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa has called out a group of what he termed “hired journalists” for their attempts to undermine the judiciary. His remarks came during a Supreme Court hearing focused on the appointment of permanent vice-chancellors at public sector universities, specifically regarding the case of Samina Malik, the Rector of the International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI).
A Call to Defend Judicial Integrity
CJP Isa’s comments reflect growing concerns about the integrity of the judiciary in the face of public criticism. He expressed frustration over the ease with which detractors hurl abuses at him, highlighting the challenges faced by the judicial system in maintaining its credibility. His remarks underline a significant issue in Pakistan’s media landscape, where the lines between journalism and defamation are increasingly blurred.
The Context of the Hearing
The Supreme Court hearing revolved around the contentious issue of appointing vice-chancellors at public universities, a matter that has implications for educational governance in Pakistan. Samina Malik’s case was brought to the forefront, with her legal counsel presenting arguments in defense of her position. The discussions are part of a broader effort to ensure accountability and transparency in the appointment processes at higher educational institutions.
Implications for the Media and Judiciary
CJP Isa’s criticism raises important questions about the role of the media in shaping public perception of the judiciary. While a free press is essential for democracy, the proliferation of “hired journalists” can threaten the balance of fair reporting and responsible critique. The CJP’s statement serves as a reminder that constructive dialogue is crucial for the health of both the judiciary and the media.
Conclusion
As Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa continues to navigate the complexities of judicial governance, his remarks against defamation highlight the pressing need for accountability in both journalism and the judiciary. The ongoing debate around the appointment of university vice-chancellors underscores the vital role that transparency plays in building public trust in state institutions. As this story unfolds, it remains to be seen how these tensions between the judiciary and media will evolve in Pakistan’s dynamic political landscape.
